Dent legislation that would clarify ‘imminent physical harm’ receives public hearing
CONTACT: Kurt Hammond, Senior Public Information Officer | 360-786-7794
Dent legislation that would clarify ‘imminent physical harm’ receives public hearing
Legislation aimed at clarifying how Washington protects children from serious harm received extensive and passionate public testimony today in the House Early Learning and Human Services Committee.
House Bill 2511, sponsored by Rep. Tom Dent, R-Moses Lake, defines “imminent physical harm” in state law to mean a substantial risk of serious harm to a child’s safety or well-being. The bill seeks to bring clarity and consistency to a standard already used by courts, law enforcement, hospitals, and child welfare professionals when making urgent decisions about child safety.
During the public hearing, lawmakers heard emotional testimony from parents, caregivers, advocates, and professionals, with individuals speaking both in support of and in opposition to the bill.
“We have seen a distressing increase in the number of children under state supervision who have died or suffered near-fatal incidents over the last several years. Many members in my caucus, as well as across the aisle, have been working to find a balanced solution,” Dent said. “There are no easy answers. It was clear from the testimony that this is a very emotional issue, and it underscores just how important it is that we get this right.”
Dent emphasized that HB 2511 does not expand the authority to remove children from their homes, nor does it lower the threshold for intervention. Instead, the bill provides a clearer definition of an existing legal standard that is already being applied.
“The phrase ‘imminent physical harm’ carries enormous weight, but it isn’t clearly defined,” Dent said. “That lack of clarity can lead to inconsistent decisions and uncertainty for families and professionals alike. This bill is about fairness, transparency, and making sure decisions are based on a shared understanding of risk.”
HB 2511 outlines that a substantial risk of serious harm may arise from conditions in the home, the caregiving environment, or caregiver conduct or omission. The bill provides examples such as physical abuse, chronic unsafe living conditions, failure to meet a child’s basic needs, caregiver impairment due to substance abuse, and exposure to illicit substances, while allowing courts to continue evaluating each case individually.
Dent also noted that the bill preserves existing safeguards, including requirements that courts consider prevention services and alternatives to removal whenever possible.
“Protecting children and preserving families are not competing goals,” Dent said. “Clear standards help everyone involved make better decisions while respecting parental rights.”
The policy committee cutoff is Wednesday, Feb. 4. That would be the last day the committee could act on the bill.
The Legislature is scheduled to adjourn on March 12.
